Reflections Week VI

Throughout the last few weeks, we have been learning about three international relations theories that characterize different perceptions and lenses with which to view the world. Interpreting motivations and actions of states through the manner of a Realist, Liberal, or Constructivist obviously yields far different explanations and formulations with which to explain a states behavior, determine its standing in relation to other states, and formulate a plan with which to reach its objectives. Benjamin J. Cohen’s article discussing the Bretton Woods system and the International Monetary Regime spanning the 40’s until the 70’s lent itself well to analysis through the lenses of the three theories. After determining both “Why did the US do it?” and “Why did other countries go along with it?” not only did more distinctions under the umbrella of a certain theory arise, such as Realist Constructivism, but examinations of two of the three theories yielded important information regarding the remaining theory. In short, the exercise clearly defined the understanding of three perspectives of a particular issue as a most crucial tool to better allow one to understand his chosen perspective to the fullest.